> > >
Sections in this Topic
The Federal Reserve Board has a broad range of enforcement powers over both domestic and foreign financial institutions and over the individuals associated with them. Generally, informal or formal enforcement actions are taken after a bank examination, but they might also be taken when a Reserve Bank becomes aware that a problem at a bank warrants immediate attention and correction. Maintaining a close relationship with your primary regulator or bank supervisor is important and can help with enforcement issues. (See Life Cycle Topic: "The Supervisory Process and Regulatory Relations.")
The objective of formal action is to correct practices that the regulators believe to be unlawful, unsafe, or unsound. The following statutory tools are available to the Board.
Generally, the Board may use its cease-and-desist authority against a state member bank and any institution-affiliated party when it finds that a bank or party is engaging, has engaged, or is about to engage in
If a violation or threatened violation of law, rule, or regulation, or if engagement in an unsafe or unsound practice specified in the notice of charges, is likely to cause the bank’s insolvency, cause significant dissipation of the bank’s assets or earnings, weaken the bank’s condition, or otherwise prejudice the interests of depositors before the completion of the proceedings (initiated by the issuance of the notice of charges), the Board may, in conjunction with issuing a notice of charges, issue a temporary cease-and desist order against the bank or any institution-affiliated party to effect immediate correction.
When any final order or temporary cease-and desist order has been violated, the Board may apply to a U.S. district court for enforcement of the action. The court may order and require compliance. Violations of final orders and written agreements may also give rise to the assessment of civil money penalties against the offending bank or institution-affiliated party, as circumstances warrant.
As a general rule, supervisory actions are considered when other, more routine measures, such as formal discussions with a bank’s principals or directors and normal follow-up procedures, have failed to resolve supervisory concerns. The Uniform Interagency Bank Rating System clearly identifies the more serious problem banks. See the topic Bank Rating System for more information on how regulators determine ratings.
When circumstances warrant a less severe form of formal supervisory action, a written agreement may be used. A written agreement may be with either the Board or with the Reserve Bank under delegated authority. The agreement may relate to any of the problems found at the bank or to any problems involving institution-affiliated parties.
The Board is also authorized to remove any current institution-affiliated party of a bank for certain violations and misconduct, to bar permanently from the banking industry any current or former institution-affiliated party, and to prohibit any current or former institution-affiliated party from future involvement with any insured depository institution, bank or thrift holding company, or nonbank subsidiary. This authority is distinct from the Board’s authority under prompt corrective action to dismiss senior officers from a particular bank.
Informal supervisory tools are used when circumstances warrant a less severe form of action than the formal supervisory actions described above. Informal actions are not enforceable, and their violation cannot serve as a basis for assessing a civil money penalty or initiating a removal and prohibition action. Informal actions are not published or publicly available. These informal actions include the following: